
I still feel pretty fresh out of an environment where 90%+ of my course instruction was delivered completely online. And while I never met many of my students face-to-face (F2F), I still felt like I knew my students well. My four years spent in the College of Education + Human Development at the University of Minnesota (UMN) served as a significant paradigm shift for me in terms of how I engage students while meeting standards and learning targets without F2F instruction. Furthermore, my time at UMN challenged my perspective how technology affects learning, instruction, and assessment.
In the early 2010s a group of 10 innovative high school educators challenged the status quo designing our district’s first-ever hybrid and online instruction. This grassroots group created opportunities for hybrid and online instructional design to better prepare students for post-secondary life — college or university, military, corporate, or vocational. We lobbied for opportunities for new ways to engage learners both in the classroom and outside those same four walls. We used a lot of the tools and skills below. Even more importantly, we each designed learning environments differently due to our content areas and unique pedagogies.
I’m soon bringing the skills, frameworks, and enthusiasm to our staff at Blaine High School to consider the following using highly accessible and familiar tools for contexts like I have already witnessed as a Learning Technologies Coach:
- I’m a social studies teacher who wants to design a student-centered opportunity where kids lead virtual tours of salient historical locations. How can I share a link that includes handouts, screencasts, and easy-to-understand instructions while I conference with my students at risk to make learning even more memorable?
- My math students have diverse ability ranges. I want my mastery students to continue to be challenged while meeting the needs of my rehearsal students. How can I design a day that all kids learn at their own pace?
- Our fifth day of the trimester is putting my science students at risk of not keeping pace with course content. How can my students engage with content while not on campus with me?
Take a few moments and explore my shared agenda at this link: bit.ly/3aoGiaxIt will help to do two things to make this agenda even more comprehensible:
|
![]() |
Next, consider these two components when designing a similar agenda:
Intentional Instructional Design
Bloom’s Taxonomy | Agenda items 1-3 are in the lower half of Bloom’s updated Taxonomy. The last half of the agenda is all in top half: analyze, evaluate, and create. This is designed intentionally with a variety of tasks and outcomes appropriate for the language level to increase engagement.
Communication Modes (specific for World Language teachers)
This lesson design embodies all three modes of communication per the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages:
|
Interpretive |
Interpersonal |
Presentational |
|
6) VoiceThread Daily Routine assignment w/peer-to-peer comments (writing)
|
2) Daily Routine Song
4) Twiccionario (presentational writing) 6) VoiceThread Daily Routine assignment |
Technology Tasks for Teachers From This Agenda

Closing Thoughts | Lead With The Task
My friend Lauren Rosen from the University of Wisconsin Madison uses this phrase and I love it: “Lead with the task” when integrating technology. A continuous takeaway I have from her PD sessions is to go back to your goals with tech tools. Ensure that you have pedagogical purpose. Keep asking yourself, your PLC or Collaborative Team, “What do I want my kids to achieve as a result of using technology?”














